|
|
|
|
February 2001
March 2001 April 2001 September 2001 October 2001 November 2001 December 2001 January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 October 2007 December 2007 January 2008 Now contact:
|
Thursday, November 27, 2003 -
I read two books yesterday. Albeit, they were short (each was a little over 100 pages), but they were both worth reading. The first was Flatland by Edwin Abbot, a geometry novel, which I've been meaning to read for several years. I figured since I was going to be a philosopher I may as well read it. I have to go over it again, because I think I was complaining to myself about it while I read it, but I liked the general idea. The analogy was so simple, and I honestly think that's where it's benefit lies, but the book left a lot of questions about Spaceland that I couldn't answer in an afternoon. (I want Mary to keep up teaching me her geometry, because I'm slacking. She's much better at it than I am... And it's harder for me to follow the stage after construction, because it's not as concrete. But I'll work on that, too.)
The second was Anthem, by Ayn Rand. It was like my roommate Eric trying to get out of doing the dishes or something. There were some good ideas, but I have some serious questions, again, about the perspective of good. It's true, that the benefits and rights of an individual can not be overlooked, but I'm not so sure that the rampant individualism she seems to encourage would do exactly what she thinks it would do. It reminds me again of The Perks of Being a Wallflower, where Charlie is told to read Rand, but to "be a filter, not a sponge." And it also reminds me of this year's anti-objectivist movement at St. Johns, which put up a poster titled "Ayn Rand is a Raging Bitch." Hehe, that still makes me chuckle...
Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post: |
|
|
|